Target: Maxime Antier, Public Prosecutor, Vannes Judicial Court, France
Goal: Pursue meaningful penalties and lawful animal-keeping restrictions for proven mistreatment of pigs allegedly left hungry, wounded, and surrounded by decomposing carcasses.
Food, water, and treatment are basic needs. At two pig farms, animals were allegedly left hungry and wounded among decomposing carcasses. Footage released by L214 purportedly showed severely thin pigs in filthy buildings, with dead animals even near feeding areas. The allegations describe suffering that no commercial operation should be permitted to inflict.
The operator’s criminal case reached a hearing, alongside allegations involving slurry pollution and concealed labor. Operations had previously been suspended. Prosecutors requested a suspended prison sentence, and a decision is expected soon. The court has not yet determined the defendant’s criminal liability.
A suspended sentence request is not a verdict, and the eventual outcome must reflect the offenses actually proved. Animal welfare deserves consideration alongside the other charges. Support meaningful penalties, appropriate restrictions on keeping animals, and a prompt prosecutorial review of any available appeal grounds once judgment is delivered.
PETITION LETTER:
Dear Prosecutor Antier,
We urge your office to pursue a substantial response to any animal mistreatment proved in the case of two pig farms where animals were reportedly found wounded amid decomposing bodies. Allegations of hungry pigs living beside rotting carcasses, with injuries left untreated, raise grave concerns about prolonged suffering. The animals’ dependence on human care should inform the assessment of culpability wherever the evidence establishes an offense.
Ensure that the veterinary findings, inspection history, and authenticated recordings inform the prosecution’s position through the remaining proceedings. Any lawful sentencing submissions should address the duration of established suffering, the animals affected, and demonstrated risks of recurrence. Requests concerning pollution or labor offenses should not eclipse the animal welfare allegations. The court must decide independently.
After judgment, examine whether any appeal is legally available and justified by the findings and sentence. Seek animal-keeping or professional restrictions where authorized and warranted, alongside penalties that properly reflect proven harm. Closing a business cannot resolve responsibility for established offenses. Please use your authority to secure meaningful accountability and help prevent further suffering, while respecting the defendant’s right to a fair determination.
Sincerely,
[Your Name Here]
Photo credit: Ibex73
