![](https://forcechange.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/MN_Dog_by_OJ_Minnepolis-310x207.jpg)
Target: Brad Johnson, County Attorney for Anoka County, Minnesota
Goal: Ensure rescued dogs receive proper care and prevent unnecessary euthanasia.
Reports indicate that a group of dogs was rescued from severe neglect and taken into the care of an emergency shelter. Now, a dispute has emerged between the Anoka County Sheriff’s Office and the shelter regarding custody of the animals. Authorities want the dogs transferred to the Animal Humane Society for forensic testing as part of an investigation into alleged animal cruelty. However, concerns have been raised that the Humane Society might euthanize the animals rather than rehabilitate them.
Tammy Gimpl, an animal control worker, facilitated the surrender of the dogs to a shelter in hopes of providing them with urgent medical attention and a chance at recovery. However, she has refused to hand them over to authorities, fearing they will be unnecessarily put down. In response, the sheriff’s office executed a search warrant to seize the dogs, but they were no longer at the shelter at that time. Authorities are now searching for the missing dogs to proceed with their forensic evaluation.
These animals have already suffered immense hardship. If forensic testing is necessary, it must be conducted in a way that prioritizes the dogs’ well-being and survival. The ultimate goal should be to ensure these animals are placed in caring, responsible homes rather than facing an untimely end. Sign below and demand proper safeguards be put in place to guarantee these dogs are treated with the compassion they deserve.
PETITION LETTER:
Dear Mr. Johnson,
Reports indicate that a group of dogs rescued from an alleged neglect situation have become the subject of a custody dispute between your office and an emergency shelter. While forensic testing may be necessary to further an investigation, there are serious concerns that transferring these animals to the Animal Humane Society could result in unnecessary euthanasia rather than their rehabilitation and rehoming.
These dogs have already seemingly endured significant suffering. If forensic examinations are required, they should be conducted in a manner that prioritizes the well-being of the animals. The ultimate goal should be to ensure these dogs are given a chance at a better life, not subjected to further harm.
We urge you to work with the appropriate organizations to ensure these animals receive the care they need and that any legal procedures do not lead to their unnecessary euthanasia. Protecting these innocent animals should be the priority.
Sincerely,
[Your Name Here]
Photo credit: OJ_Minneapolis
What makes the shelter feel the dogs may be put down if transferred to the Humane Society? Has this happened before where the Humane Society has committed this unnecessary act? If so, I certainly would have a lack of trust. Perhaps they do need to be give each dog a once over, but then custody belongs to the shelter so they can begin the healing process.
Lilypearl