Stop University from Performing Medical Testing on Animals

Target: Washington University Provost Edward S. Macias

Goal: Urge Washington University to cease using live cats within all pediatric medical training courses

For years, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has been putting pressure on Washington University and its partner, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, to discontinue the use of live cats within the university’s Pediatric advanced life-support (PALS) class. This course teaches students how to insert a tube into the windpipe of an infant who is struggling to breathe.

In April, PETA released a video shot from inside one of the university’s labs showing how the cats were anesthetized and intubated during the training. The video revealed that some cats were improperly anesthetized, causing them to wake during the procedure, thus leaving them vulnerable to injury.

In late May, the university announced that the use of live cats within the course would cease. According to the Riverfront Times, St. Louis Children’s Hospital spokeswoman, Jackie Ferman, confirmed that this change would be permanent. However, on June 12, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch received a letter from Washington University doctors stating that, although the use of live cats within the PALS course has been permanently discontinued, other pediatric intubation courses would continue to use live animals.

The letter further explained that the university feels using live animals is the best way to prepare students for the actual act of intubating an infant. However, according to a survey conducted by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), over ninety-eight percent of the pediatric residency programs within the United States choose to use infant simulators rather than live animals within their training programs.

By choosing to continue using live cats within their pediatric intubation training programs, Washington University and St. Louis Children’s Hospital are needlessly harming animals. Sign this petition and urge the university and hospital to discontinue the use of live animals within all of their pediatric medical training programs.


Dear Washington University Provost Edward S. Macias,

Using live animals within your pediatric intubation programs must be discontinued.

The majority of the pediatric medical residency programs within the United States no longer use live animals for this type of training. Instead, they choose to use non-animal methods of teaching, such as the infant simulator. According to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, these simulators, when designed properly, can be more effective and useful than live animal methods of teaching.

While it is understandable that the university wants its students to be prepared and able to accurately intubate an infant, it is no longer necessary to continue using live animals to accomplish this goal.


[Your Name Here]

Photo credit: Public Domain

Sign the Petition

  • Only your name will be displayed. By signing, you accept our terms and may receive updates on this and related causes.
FacebookCare2 NewsTwitterEmailShare


  1. J Davidson says:

    We aren’t in medieval times anymore.

  2. gwendoline Amato says:

    this is an abomination
    it must stop

  3. Experimentalists have to stop immediately these kind of infantile, cruel and barbaric tests on living creatures by apply strongest justice to them – SEND THEM TO THE WORKLESS ONLY !

    Animal testing is unnecessary and the results unreliable. This has been proven.
    So these establishments are just a means for monsters to torture and kill animals.
    In the 21st century do we really believe this is furthering our knowledge at all?
    Absolutely not! This is murder for murder’s sake and UNBEARABLY FOR CIVILIZED SOCIETIES.




    People need to vote unacting dumb authorities and officials acting irresponsibly to futuregenerations out of occupations NOW AND FOR ALL!

    Normaltive ethic includes the claim on generally liability.

  4. Could you accept these things in your own body ?
    It is awful and must be stopped

  5. Chiley~♬ Chiley~♬ says:

    Hey, I have a better idea! 😀
    HOW ABOUT USING ACTUAL LIVE INFANTS? It’s training for them, right? I mean, if you’re testing on live innocent animals, that means it’s okay to do it to humans too, right?
    Yeah… no. If they aren’t going to do this on actual infants, which the training is for, then why should they do it on cats?

  6. It has been proven since ancient age gone by that are as good as any animal tests to humans. Often the opposite is the case. In animals, “happy you” in humans, it is deadly! Researchers want to live out their sadism, are unrealistic and stupid! The researchers are much more effective to do without animal testing, but “cold made” from the tormentors.
    Is also still a lot of money in the game, so there is the greed to do so. All this unnecessary suffering to animals ….

  7. Why don’t the students refuse to do that? This would be the first step.

  8. you are only the barbarian bastards … intubate your children, wives, husbands … you have to die in agony bastards

  9. Van oudenhove madeleine says:

    Changez US ! C’est BELGIQUE !!!!! Merci

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Facebook Comments


124 Signatures

  • Brett Wolff
  • Doris Telles
  • Nitzan Steiman
  • Geri Mason
  • Darlene Roepke
  • Lynn Juozilaitis
  • Richard Ohlendorf
  • tam O
  • Mary-Carol Gales
  • Ana Maria Mainhardt Carpes
1 of 12123...12
Skip to toolbar