Demand EPA Ban Deadly Chemical in Household Products

Target: Scott Pruitt, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Goal: Follow through with ban on lethally toxic paint-thinning chemical.

A common household product is already responsible for killing dozens of people. Methlyene chloride is a chemical found in common paint thinners that has been found to be toxic to humans, yet the Environmental Protection Agency has not followed through with a proposed ban on the chemical.

The EPA had plans to ban the product altogether after Obama-era regulations were put in place, yet the agency has moved to a standstill in regards to banning the chemical. The chemical has been found to be too toxic to use indoors and has killed dozens of people already, including veterans, teenagers, and a mother of four. Sign the petition below to demand the EPA go through with the ban.

PETITION LETTER:

Dear Mr. Pruitt,

Once again, your agency is doing a terrible job at protecting the environment from harmful chemicals. This time, the problem has spread to suburbia, where people are just trying to strip paint from the sides of their houses. Nobody should have to worry about dying when they’re stripping paint.

Choosing to take your time on this issue does nothing but further harm at-risk families. There is no positive outcome that happens when you keep a toxic chemical like this legal, so why are you hesitating? We, the American people, demand a solution to this issue at once. Ban methlyene chloride now!

Sincerely,

[Your Name Here]

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

Sign the Petition

  • Upgrade to sign 100's of petitions with one-click and feed shelter animals.
  • Only your name will be displayed. By signing, you accept our terms and may receive updates on this and related causes.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FacebookCare2 NewsTwitterEmailShare

3 Comments

  1. There are so many chemical, why do we have so many?Because of animal testing. It is equally important that we do not test or make new chemicals by the way of animal testing.

  2. Gen Agustsson says:

    animals do not need to be tested in order for us to try things.

  3. A) Any government gives a damn because it would “hurt” their buddies income.

    B) Keeping people sick is big business, again keeping “cash-flow’ coming for old money.

    C) It would eliminate 1000’s of jobs and that would not look good for politicians.

    Thus, we must keep on fighting!
    Voters make greater demands, have more expectations, and hold politicians accountable!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Facebook Comments

comments

2382 Signatures

  • LeAnn Martinez
  • Jeanna Lum
  • Vanessa Bäßler
  • NANCY BILLINGS
  • Susan Probert
  • genna alain
  • Maria Scholl
  • Christine Baker
  • A. Z.
  • fat ns
1 of 238123...238
Skip to toolbar