Don’t Subsidize Corporate Logging with Taxpayer Money

The most dangerous threat to forest health, a skidder.

Target: Secretary of the Interior, Sally Jewell

Goal: End the practice of logging public lands at the expense of taxpayers.

Taxpayers subsidize logging operations in our national forests to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars every year. The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) spends this money preparing an area to be cut by building roads and sometimes, after the cutting is over, trying to repair some of the damage left by the loggers. It is government policy to give loggers wood well below market prices with the taxpayer funds making up the difference. It is also policy to reward federal forest service districts, after they complete logging projects, with whatever revenue was collected. As a result, neither loggers nor the USFS have any incentive to end the practice of conducting logging operations at taxpayers’ expense.

Many taxpayers who respect and cherish our public lands never realize it is their dollars that underwrite the destructive effects of logging operations. Some don’t realize that our forests are logged for profit by commercial loggers and often without any competitive bidding. Sometimes, these activities are conducted in the name of preventing fire or disease, but they always end with the same outcome. Corporate loggers pay next to nothing for the product they take and often without regard for the damage they do while the taxpayer picks up the bill.

Ecological research reveals naturally-occurring forest fires have many beneficial effects and removing trees as a means of preventing fire is scientifically questionable. Further, labeling the incidence of fire ‘catastrophic’ is a misnomer because forests can regenerate stronger. It’s true that communities need to be protected from fire that can involve removing trees too close to homes, but logging in remote areas, far from where people live in the name of fire protection, exhausts precious resources and doesn’t protect anyone.

Logging public lands, often destructively, at taxpayer expense means the people are paying to undermine their own legacy and that has to stop.

Again, all of this is why we need qualified public advocates, Citizen Ombudsmen, representing our interests.


Dear Secretary Jewell,

When the U.S. Forest Service plans its logging operations, it never has to think about the wishes of the American taxpayer even though it’s the taxpayer who covers the operating costs. Even as we are constantly told the marketplace makes better decisions for our economy, market pricing plays no role in the price a logger pays when logging public lands. Loggers of public lands don’t have to pay a market price because the taxpayer pays it for them. If logging our woods had to pay for itself, loggers would not be as eager to cut it.

At the same time as we pay for logging operations with our tax dollars, Americans pump millions in revenue into our public lands, every year, through user fees and the support of forest vendors like those offering accommodations. The taxpayer is the government’s source of operating revenue for our public lands whether the money is used to save the land or scar it, but we have no voice in developing proposals and can even be closed out of commenting on them.

Because the public has no voice in the development of logging proposals, it cannot insist that logging operations pay for themselves and yet, is charged for them. That has to stop. We should not be charged for logging our public legacy and the public’s opinion about how their money is spent should matter.

Again, this is why we need qualified public advocates, Citizen Ombudsmen, representing our interests.


[Your Name Here]

Photo Credit: Ernst Vikne

Sign the Petition

  • Only your name will be displayed. By signing, you accept our terms and may receive updates on this and related causes.
FacebookCare2 NewsTwitterEmailShare


  1. caryl sawyer says:

    Well, hell, why not? We already subsidize Big Oil and Big Coal and Big Ag. And we pay the salaries of bureaucrats like Ashe, Vilsack, Wheeler, Jewell, And McCarthy, who just cuddle up to the billionaires.

    Sure, let’s throw some more tax money at the parasites. Why not?

    • Feels that way, Caryl, but I appreciate your post because you made the connection I hoped to see.

      What’s happening in our forests is the exact same thing that’s happening everywhere else, it’s just more hidden. We are exhausting our natural resources for the sake of corporate profit.

  2. Jane Dineen says:

    Can’t submit without comment.

  3. mark gillono says:

    “The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future – deforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities and the spread of disease.” — The World Watch Institute

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Facebook Comments


1502 Signatures

  • Yaedi Ignatow
  • Gertie Hunt
  • sheila childs
  • joan walker
  • Holly Hall
  • Jill Ballard
  • Katie Richards
  • Alice Rim
  • Elizabeth Marino
1 of 150123...150
Skip to toolbar