Demand Repeal of Irresponsible New Gun Law

open carry

Target: Missouri State Representative Joe Don McGaugh

Goal: Repeal new gun law that encourages use of deadly force against trespassers

The Missouri State House of Representatives recently passed a bill that will allow the use of deadly force against any person who “unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a use of protective force under this section.” This law is an expansion of the “Castle Doctrine,” which allows property owners to use deadly force in the event of trespassing without the so-called “duty to retreat.”

While the law is intended to extend the Castle Doctrine to people who may be occupying a property they don’t own, like babysitters and house-sitters, in practice this language is so broad that it would allow just about anybody in almost any setting to use deadly force anytime they feel that they are protecting against “unlawful entry.” This could mean, for example, that a patron at a movie theater would be allowed to shoot someone that they think has entered without a ticket, or that someone sitting in a bar may take it upon themselves to forcefully expel another customer that has been asked to leave.

This bill is also very similar to the various “Stand Your Ground” laws, like the one in Florida under which Trayvon Martin’s killer walked free. These laws have been associated with increased vigilantism, and since the scope of this bill is essentially undefined, it is unprecedented in the leniency granted to those who would use deadly force for any reason. Demand that the Missouri House of Representatives repeal this poorly written and unnecessary law.


Dear Mr. McGaugh,

Your recent bill to expand the use of the Castle Doctrine is not “common sense,” nor is it written in a way that suggests that there are any real limits to the use of deadly force, whether in self-defense or for the purposes of protecting against “unlawful entry.”

This law will encourage those who are the least responsible with their guns to pursue the use of deadly force on any occasion in which they feel that someone has “trespassed,” even when the property in question does not belong to them. Please repeal this vague, unnecessary, and poorly written law before the shooting begins.


[Your Name Here]

Photo credit: Lucio Eastman via Wikimedia Commons

Sign the Petition

  • Only your name will be displayed. By signing, you accept our terms and may receive updates on this and related causes.
FacebookCare2 NewsTwitterEmailShare


  1. I think the example of the babysitter protecting herself and the children under her care is a good one.

    Thank you

  2. Jack Morris says:

    Yeah, no thanks. This law is a good thing. I find it gross that you wish to protect home invaders. The reason it’s broad is so that people don’t wind up in a tangle of legal nightmares after they’ve already been through the worst of situations.

    Nobody should have to choose between living the rest of their days in a cage, or die at the hands of a dangerous home invader.

  3. Jack Sigler says:

    Why would you want to protect criminals? I don’t understand why you would be against protecting yourself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Facebook Comments


95 Signatures

  • Muhammad Kamal
  • Jill Ballard
  • Alice Rim
  • sheila childs
  • Amy Wilson
  • Terrie Phenicie
  • Hermann Kastner
  • Holly Hall
  • Mal Gaff
  • Nancy Petersen
1 of 10123...10
Skip to toolbar