Comparison of the candidates’ oil and energy policies

Wednesday, May 14th, 2008

Looking at this comparison by Reuters of the presidential candidates’ energy and oil policies, it is clear that Senators Obama and Clinton are proposing more aggressive legislation than McCain.  Nonetheless, the good news is that all three candidates have significantly more pro-environmental policies than the current administration.  So at least we know some change is on the way.  Whether it will be enough to make a difference, we shall see.

Some of the highlights of the comparison:

On gas prices:

McCain and Clinton want to suspend the federal gas tax this summer.

Obama wants to temporarily stop filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

On fuel economy:

Clinton wants to increase average efficiency standards to 55 miles per gallon by 2030.

Obama wants to double the current standards by 2026.

McCain has not yet released a specific target but indicates he wants to decrease our dependence on foreign oil.

On biofuels:

All three candidates support dramatic increases in biofuel production and distribution.

Photo credit.

Sphere: Related Content

McCain reasserts his green policies

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

The widely covered political story on Monday was about a speech Sen. McCain gave in Portland regarding global warming.  In the speech, McCain attempted to distinguish himself from George Bush’s approach towards the environment by stating, “I will not shirk the mantle of leadership that the United States bears. I will not permit eight long years to pass without serious action on serious challenges.”  Some of McCain’s specific policy proposals include: mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions, the implementation of a cap-and-trade system, and promising to engage China and India diplomatically to encourage international environmental efforts. 

While it is clear that McCain is significantly more pro-environment than the majority of his fellow Republicans (he was the only Republican candidate to be in favor of emission limits and was also the co-sponsor, along with Sen. Lieberman, of one of the early Congressional attempts to implement a cap-and-trade system), he has still received substantial criticism for his environmental voting record, and recently, along with Sen. Clinton, proposed the “lose-lose-lose” policy of repealing the federal gas tax during this summer’s driving season.  If he is really going to convince pro-environment voters that he is a real pro-environment candidate, he may have to ramp up the requirements in his proposed legislation, and will definitely have to work on his consistency (as does Sen. Clinton).

 

… And more on the lose-lose-lose of the McCain/Clinton gas tax proposal:

First “lose = it would likely be ineffective, as the oil companies will probably just raise prices to make up for the spread.

Second “lose  = but if effective, it would remove an incentive to drive less and use mass transit more.

Third “lose” = it would remove a major source of revenue which is needed to fix our aging transportation infrastructure.

Photo credit.

Sphere: Related Content

In response to our readers…

Monday, March 24th, 2008

We’ve received a number of compliments regarding the photographs that accompany many of our posts. Being an environmental blog gives us the opportunity to post some great photographs from some amazing artists. So, in response, we’ve put together a gallery of recent photographs used in our posts. Clicking on any of the pictures below will take you to the corresponding post. Enjoy… and please let us know if you like this feature.

Sphere: Related Content

Gallery of recent posts

Monday, March 24th, 2008

 

 

Seventh Generation responds to our post on 1,4-dioxane.

 

Obama on the price of oil.

 

The Prius vs. the Hummer myth dissected.

 

Air Force goes supersonic on synthetic fuel.

 

A 747 flying on coconut oil?

 

Non-natural \”natural\” consumer products.

 

ECO:nomics conference participants debate “peak oil” theory.

 

China to maintain \”one child\” policy for at least another decade.

 

Big business talks green at Santa Barbara conference.

 

Chinese government creates environmental \”super ministry.\”

 

Green pollution.

 

Senators calls for hearings on drugged drinking water.

 

Companies tread a fine line between greenwashing and real positive change.

 

Attention multi-unit property owners in Southern California.

 

Another look at McCain\’s position on the environment.

 

Green politics in SF get in the way of rational policy.

 

Greenwashing a negative corporate image away.

 

A failure of leadership in the private sector.

 

Global warming skeptics use cold weather as evidence.

 

California vs. the federal governement, Revisited.

 

California sues federal government over environment (again).

 

McCain gets poor rating from environmental group.

 

Black cabs go green in NYC.

 

Texas wind shortage.

 

Plastic or paper?

 

Chinese ban on certain plastic bags begins to take effect.

 

Texas is biggest wind power generator in country and growing fast.

 

Plastic bags to be banned in Santa Monica.

 

Blackle.com does not necessarily use less energy than Google.

 

NAFTA leads to more used gas guzzlers in Mexico.

Thumbnail gallery plugin by SoftSift

Sphere: Related Content

Announcements

Welcome to ForceChange! Please feel free to comment on the posts or email us tips or feedback directly.

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe to RSS feed

Or, Subscribe to our email list
Find entries :