Google ‘Tea Kettle’ Rumor Quickly Refuted
A story tore around the web on Sunday claiming that performing two Google searches uses up as much energy as boiling a tea kettle. The story originated from an article in the TimesOnline. However, as Jason Kincaid at TechCrunch points out, the Times’ article was misleading, inaccurate, and poorly researched, among other things.
Google also contributed to its own defense with a quick response on its blog:
We thought it would be helpful to explain why this number is *many* times too high. Google is fast – a typical search returns results in less than 0.2 seconds. Queries vary in degree of difficulty, but for the average query, the servers it touches each work on it for just a few thousandths of a second. Together with other work performed before your search even starts (such as building the search index) this amounts to 0.0003 kWh of energy per search, or 1 kJ. For comparison, the average adult needs about 8000 kJ a day of energy from food, so a Google search uses just about the same amount of energy that your body burns in ten seconds.
In terms of greenhouse gases, one Google search is equivalent to about 0.2 grams of CO2. The current EU standard for tailpipe emissions calls for 140 grams of CO2 per kilometer driven, but most cars don’t reach that level yet. Thus, the average car driven for one kilometer (0.6 miles for those in the U.S.) produces as many greenhouse gases as a thousand Google searches.
- Similar Posts:
- Blackle.com does not necessarily use less energy than Google.
- The AP misses the point with carbon footprint analysis of Schwarzenegger’s Global Climate Summit
- ‘Climate change is not the story of our time’
Comments
Please contribute to the discussion by leaving a comment below. No need to agree with the post or other commenters, but please be constructive and respectful.
