Los Angeles Measure R passes, allowing for massive transportation infrastructure upgrades

November 5, 2008

By a slim margin, Los Angeles County voters passed Measure R.  A little over 67% of the voters approved the measure, which required a 2/3 super-majority.  Steve Hymon at the LATimes notes:

 

Early work is likely to include an extension of the Expo Line from Culver City to Santa Monica, an extension of the Gold Line from Pasadena to Azusa and placement of a busway or light-rail line along Crenshaw Boulevard in South Los Angeles, planners say.

But approval of a half-cent sales tax delivered a more immediate victory to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who came into office more than three years ago pledging to finally start the city’s so-called Subway to the Sea. Now, money to begin such a subterranean route — probably along the Wilshire corridor — is assured by the Measure R plan.

“The commuters of LA were fed up with traffic and gas prices, and they responded by making an historic investment that will change the face of transportation in the region forever,” Villaraigosa said.

« Previous Post | Next Post »

Comments

6 Comments on Los Angeles Measure R passes, allowing for massive transportation infrastructure upgrades

  1. gavin richardson on Wed, 5th Nov 2008 1:09 pm

    2. I am so glad that measure R passed. I have been a bus operator for MTA for the last 10 years. Every day I see the problems that face our great city, as far as public transportation is concerned.One day I picked up an administrater on his way to work at MTA. We talked a bit about transportation issues. I told him subways are the answer, not more and more buses on the street. One of these politicians needs to get brave and beg borrow or steal to get the funds for having not one, but many boring machines making new subways. They may curse that politician today, but in years to come they will make gold statues in his/her name.

    [Reply]

  2. Ian on Wed, 5th Nov 2008 1:48 pm

    3. People need to get over the 1/2 a cent aspect. First of all that is chump change, and secondly it is about TIME for the public transportation system down here to be brought up to date.

    If you’ve been to or lived in NY you will understand.

    [Reply]

  3. Ken on Wed, 5th Nov 2008 2:26 pm

    4. Agree. However, I wouldn’t use NY as a barometer. Tokyo has best transpo. in the world and should be the model to follow.

    [Reply]

  4. forcechange on Wed, 5th Nov 2008 9:43 pm

    5. I don’t know much about Tokyo’s system, but I think the Bay Area’s public transit is a pretty good model for LA. They use a good mixture of heavy rail with BART and light rail with Muni. Although their traffic is still pretty bad, you can pretty much travel throughout most of the region pretty easily.

    [Reply]

  5. Jason H on Thu, 6th Nov 2008 1:35 pm

    6. Better yet, consider the excellent metro system in Paris. Having lived there for nearly a year I never felt the need for a car. A hub-and-spoke arrangement with a few ‘wheel’ routes coupled with links to high speed rail stations and you’ve solved a lot of transportation problems.
    LA is much more spread out, but we have to start tackling the problem. Next step would be ample “park-and-ride” spots at outlying metro stops with secure, monitored areas to leave cars while commuting to work..

    [Reply]

  6. Marint on Thu, 13th Nov 2008 1:09 am

    7. So far, the metro is doing a great job in the areas that its in. If you go downtown, you’ll see packed trains and train stops…now they just need to get it going over on the Westside. I think any model is better than the nothingness we have now!

    [Reply]

Please contribute to the discussion by commenting below or posting in the forums. No need to agree with the post or other commenters, but please be constructive and respectful.